NEASC INTEGRITY COMMITTEE
April 16, 2003
Draft Report Revisions
1. John Ribezzo’s recommendations (all on p. 5):
number of FTEs), in the first bullet, be preceded by e.g.?
be spelled out?
sentence, in the third bullet, should add “other” to "communicate and
collaborate with each …"
2. Steering Committee recommendations (from 4/11 meeting):
and weaknesses according to their respective degrees of strength and
weakness. Such a ranking will present the data more precisely and
consequently be more informative to the visiting accreditation team.
Address all Neasc accreditation standards in your
report (I believe we omitted #s 8 and 9, which are about the institution’s
relation to CIHE accreditation issues). See
In its relationships with the Commission on Institutions of Higher
Education, the institution demonstrates honesty and integrity, and it
complies with the Commission’s Standards, policies, and requests.
In addition to the considerations stated in this Standard, the
institution adheres to those requirements related to institutional
integrity embodied in all other Commission Standards.
3. Committee recommendations for our 2114 CCRI Integrity committee
4. Plans for a committee celebration of the completion of our project????