Introduction to Wireless Networks

CCRI ETEK-1500

Module-12

802.11n Information and Status

Contents

  1. 802.11n Status

  2. Comparison to 802.11a/b/g

  3. 802.11n Features

  4. Multiple Antennas and MIMO

  5. Performance in a Mixed Deployment

  6. Pre-Standard Products

  7. 802.11n Concerns and Deployment Strategy

  8. Topic 8

  9. Topic 9

  10. Topic 10

1. 802.11n Status

Work on the 802.11n standard dates back to 2004.

The draft is expected to be finalized in November 2008 with publication in July 2009.

Major manufacturers are now releasing 'pre-N', 'draft n' or 'MIMO-based' products based on early specs.

 

http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/tgn_update.htm

As of November 2007 a Draft 3.0 has been voted on and passed by 84.8%.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

 

2.  Comparison to 802.11a/b/g

 

Protocol

Release Date

Op. Frequency

Throughput (Typ)

Data Rate (Max)

Modulation Technique

Range (Radius Indoor) Depends, # and type of walls

Range (Radius Outdoor) Loss includes one wall

802.11a

1999

5 GHz

23 Mbps

54 Mbps

OFDM

~35 Meters

~120 Meters

802.11b

1999

2.4 GHz

4.3 Mbps

11 Mbps

DSSS -CCK

~38 Meters

~140 Meters

802.11g

2003

2.4 GHz

19 Mbps

54 Mbps

OFDM & DSSS

~38 Meters

~140 Meters

802.11n

June 2009
(est.)

2.4 GHz
5 GHz

74 Mbps

248 Mbps

OFDM MIMO

~70 Meters

~250 Meters

CCK-Complementary Code Keying  

    

OFDM-Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing   

 

DSSS-Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum

 

 MIMO-Multi-Input Multi-Output

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

3.  802.11n Features

Performance

There are three basic parameters that completely describe the quality and usefulness

of any wireless link: speed, range and reliability. Prior to the development of MIMOOFDM,

the three parameters were interrelated according to strict rules. Speed could

be increased only by sacrificing range and reliability. Range could be extended at

the expense of speed and reliability. And reliability could be improved by reducing

speed and range. MIMO OFDM has redefined the tradeoffs, clearly demonstrating

that it can boost all three parameters simultaneously. While MIMO will ultimately

benefit every major wireless industry including mobile telephone, the wireless LAN

industry is leading the way in exploiting MIMO innovations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

 

4.  Multiple Antennas and MIMO

Most radio transmit from a single antenna. The transmitted signal is subject to multipath propagation effects. This includes bouncing off objects, atmospheric layers and distortion as radio signals go through various materials.

Multipath signals arrive at the receiver at different times. If all arriving signals are considered by the receiver some signals will be in phase, producing an increase in signal power. Other signals will arrive out of phase an this will produce reduced signal power. A common strategy is to ignore weaker multipath signals and to use strongest multipath signals. This waste the arriving signal power in the first case and cause distorting issues in the second case.

 

Beamforming (beam steering)

Employs  one transmitter, two  transmitter antennas, and one receiving antenna to receive the best Multipath signal.

 

Diversity (receiver combining)

Employs  one transmitter, one transmitter antenna, and two receiving antennas to receive the best Multipath signal.

 

Physically Resembles MIMO

Employs  one transmitter, one transmitter antenna, and two receiving antennas to receive the best Multipath signal. Form of beam steering and diversity with only one signal sent over a channel. This is  not MIMO.

MIMO (Multiple In - Multiple Out)

Employs  multiple transmitters, multiple transmitter antennas, two receiving antennas to and two receivers. Multiple transmitter antennas send multiple signals over the same channel, multiplying spectral efficiency.

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

MIMO Characteristics

MIMO, in contrast, takes advantage of multipath propagation to increase throughput,

range/coverage, and reliability. Rather than combating multipath signals, MIMO puts

multipath signals to work carrying more information. This is accomplished by

sending and receiving more than one data signal in the same radio channel at the

same time. The use of multiple waveforms constitutes a new type of radio

communication—communication using multi-dimensional signals—which is the only

way known to improve all three basic link performance parameters (range, speed

and reliability).

Because MIMO transmits multiple signals across the communications channel (rather

than the conventional system’s single signal), MIMO has the ability to multiply

capacity (which is another word for “speed”). A common measure of wireless

capacity is spectral efficiency—the number of units of information per unit of time

per unit of bandwidth—usually denoted in bits per second per Hertz, or b/s/Hz.

Using conventional radio technology, engineers struggle to increase spectral

efficiency incrementally (i.e. one b/s/Hz at a time). By transmitting multiple signals

containing different information streams over the same frequency channel, MIMO

provides a means of doubling or tripling spectral efficiency.

MIMO can also be thought of as a multi-dimensional wireless communications

system. Conventional radio systems try to squeeze as much information as possible

through a one-dimensional pipe. In order to do that, engineers must adapt their

designs to the noise and other limitations of a one-dimensional channel. MIMO

empowers engineers to work in multiple dimensions, creating opportunities to work

around the limitations of a one-dimensional channel.

Greater spectral efficiency translates into higher data rates, greater range, an

increased number of users, enhanced reliability, or any combination of the preceding

factors. By multiplying spectral efficiency, MIMO opens the door to a variety of new

The first paper describing wireless MIMO’s capacity

multiplying capability was published 100 years later in the 1996 Global

Communications Conference proceedings2

How Does MIMO Differ from the Smart Antenna?

MIMO and “smart antenna” systems may look the same on first examination: Both

employ multiple antennas spaced as far apart as practical. But look under the hood,

and you will see that MIMO and smart antenna systems are fundamentally different3.

Smart antennas enhance conventional, one-dimensional radio systems. The most

common smart antenna systems use beamforming (a.k.a. beam switching) to

concentrate the signal energy on the main path and receive combining (a.k.a.

diversity) to capture the strongest signal at any given moment. Note that

beamforming and receive combining are only multipath mitigation techniques, and

do not multiply data throughput over the wireless channel. See Figure 2.

That’s not to say beamforming and receive combining aren’t useful. Both have

demonstrated an ability to improve performance incrementally in point-to-point

applications (e.g., outdoor wireless backhaul applications). However, while

beamforming and receive combining are valuable enhancements to conventional

radio systems, MIMO is a paradigm shift, dramatically changing perceptions of and

responses to multipath propagation. While receive combining and beamforming

increase spectral efficiency one or two b/s/Hz at a time; MIMO multiplies the b/s/Hz.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

6. Channel Bonding- Another performance-enhancing technique

Assuming the channels are available, Channel bonding multiplies throughput by combining two or more radio channels.

The cost of channel bonding is increased bandwidth consumption.  --channel bonding may not be an option because frequencies have been allocated to other users.

Both MIMO and channel bonding can multiply throughput.

key differences between the approaches.

Though channel bonding increases throughput and capacity, it may reduce range slightly. MIMO enhances all three performance attributes simultaneously. And while channel bonding increases throughput by consuming more bandwidth, MIMO increases spectral efficiency, multiplying throughput in the same bandwidth.

Smart antennas and channel bonding are important and useful technologies but theymust not be confused with MIMO technology. If everything else is equal, MIMO-based products will outperform smart antenna- and channel bonding-based products.

However, the different technologies are not necessarily adversaries: MIMO-based products can make judicious use of smart antennas and channel bonding to offer even more benefits.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

5.   802.11n Will Have to Operate in a Mixed Deployment

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

 

 

6.  Pre-Standard Products

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

 

7.  802.11n Deployment Strategy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

 

Topic 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top

 

 

 

Topic 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Top