Introduction to Wireless Networks
Module-12
802.11n Information and Status
Contents
| 1. 802.11n Status
Work on the 802.11n standard dates back to 2004. The draft is expected to be finalized in November 2008 with publication in July 2009. Major manufacturers are now releasing 'pre-N', 'draft n' or 'MIMO-based' products based on early specs.
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/tgn_update.htm As of November 2007 a Draft 3.0 has been voted on and passed by 84.8%. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11n
|
| 2. Comparison to 802.11a/b/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. 802.11n Features Performance There are three basic parameters that completely describe the quality and usefulness of any wireless link: speed, range and reliability. Prior to the development of MIMOOFDM, the three parameters were interrelated according to strict rules. Speed could be increased only by sacrificing range and reliability. Range could be extended at the expense of speed and reliability. And reliability could be improved by reducing speed and range. MIMO OFDM has redefined the tradeoffs, clearly demonstrating that it can boost all three parameters simultaneously. While MIMO will ultimately benefit every major wireless industry including mobile telephone, the wireless LAN industry is leading the way in exploiting MIMO innovations.
|
| 4. Multiple
Antennas and MIMO Most radio transmit from a single antenna. The transmitted signal is subject to multipath propagation effects. This includes bouncing off objects, atmospheric layers and distortion as radio signals go through various materials. Multipath signals arrive at the receiver at different times. If all arriving signals are considered by the receiver some signals will be in phase, producing an increase in signal power. Other signals will arrive out of phase an this will produce reduced signal power. A common strategy is to ignore weaker multipath signals and to use strongest multipath signals. This waste the arriving signal power in the first case and cause distorting issues in the second case.
Beamforming (beam steering) Employs one transmitter, two transmitter antennas, and one receiving antenna to receive the best Multipath signal.
Diversity (receiver combining) Employs one transmitter, one transmitter antenna, and two receiving antennas to receive the best Multipath signal.
Physically Resembles MIMO Employs one transmitter, one transmitter antenna, and two receiving antennas to receive the best Multipath signal. Form of beam steering and diversity with only one signal sent over a channel. This is not MIMO.
MIMO (Multiple In - Multiple Out) Employs multiple transmitters,
multiple transmitter antennas, two receiving antennas to and two
receivers. Multiple transmitter antennas send multiple signals over the
same channel, multiplying spectral efficiency.
|
| MIMO Characteristics MIMO, in contrast, takes advantage of multipath propagation to increase throughput, range/coverage, and reliability. Rather than combating multipath signals, MIMO puts multipath signals to work carrying more information. This is accomplished by sending and receiving more than one data signal in the same radio channel at the same time. The use of multiple waveforms constitutes a new type of radio communication—communication using multi-dimensional signals—which is the only way known to improve all three basic link performance parameters (range, speed and reliability). Because MIMO transmits multiple signals across the communications channel (rather than the conventional system’s single signal), MIMO has the ability to multiply capacity (which is another word for “speed”). A common measure of wireless capacity is spectral efficiency—the number of units of information per unit of time per unit of bandwidth—usually denoted in bits per second per Hertz, or b/s/Hz. Using conventional radio technology, engineers struggle to increase spectral efficiency incrementally (i.e. one b/s/Hz at a time). By transmitting multiple signals containing different information streams over the same frequency channel, MIMO provides a means of doubling or tripling spectral efficiency. MIMO can also be thought of as a multi-dimensional wireless communications system. Conventional radio systems try to squeeze as much information as possible through a one-dimensional pipe. In order to do that, engineers must adapt their designs to the noise and other limitations of a one-dimensional channel. MIMO empowers engineers to work in multiple dimensions, creating opportunities to work around the limitations of a one-dimensional channel. Greater spectral efficiency translates into higher data rates, greater range, an increased number of users, enhanced reliability, or any combination of the preceding factors. By multiplying spectral efficiency, MIMO opens the door to a variety of new The first paper describing wireless MIMO’s capacity multiplying capability was published 100 years later in the 1996 Global Communications Conference proceedings 2How Does MIMO Differ from the Smart Antenna? MIMO and “smart antenna” systems may look the same on first examination: Both employ multiple antennas spaced as far apart as practical. But look under the hood, and you will see that MIMO and smart antenna systems are fundamentally different 3.Smart antennas enhance conventional, one-dimensional radio systems. The most common smart antenna systems use beamforming (a.k.a. beam switching) toconcentrate the signal energy on the main path and receive combining (a.k.a.diversity ) to capture the strongest signal at any given moment. Note thatbeamforming and receive combining are only multipath mitigation techniques, and do not multiply data throughput over the wireless channel. See Figure 2.That’s not to say beamforming and receive combining aren’t useful. Both have demonstrated an ability to improve performance incrementally in point-to-point applications (e.g., outdoor wireless backhaul applications). However, while beamforming and receive combining are valuable enhancements to conventional radio systems, MIMO is a paradigm shift, dramatically changing perceptions of and responses to multipath propagation. While receive combining and beamforming increase spectral efficiency one or two b/s/Hz at a time; MIMO multiplies the b/s/Hz.
|
| 6. Channel Bonding-
Another performance-enhancing technique
Assuming the channels are available, Channel bonding multiplies throughput by combining two or more radio channels. The cost of channel bonding is increased bandwidth consumption. --channel bonding may not be an option because frequencies have been allocated to other users. Both MIMO and channel bonding can multiply throughput. key differences between the approaches. Though channel bonding increases throughput and capacity, it may reduce range slightly. MIMO enhances all three performance attributes simultaneously. And while channel bonding increases throughput by consuming more bandwidth, MIMO increases spectral efficiency, multiplying throughput in the same bandwidth. Smart antennas and channel bonding are important and useful technologies but theymust not be confused with MIMO technology. If everything else is equal, MIMO-based products will outperform smart antenna- and channel bonding-based products. However, the different technologies are not necessarily adversaries: MIMO-based products can make judicious use of smart antennas and channel bonding to offer even more benefits.
|
| 5. 802.11n Will Have to Operate in a
Mixed Deployment
|
| 6. Pre-Standard Products
|
| 7. 802.11n Deployment Strategy
|
| Topic 8
|
| Topic 10
|